But why? Because the main ...

But why? Because the basic instinct - "Pusher life" makes us need to "live simply, to exist, perceive the world. Our consciousness is "equipped" not only instinct and memory, but we have the same and "PC" (PK), which is able to solve logical problems, optimize and rationalize our actions and our emotions. If we lose 10dollarov, we are disappointed. If we give these 10dollarov, and instead we get a valuable thing for us, we rejoice - a valuable purchase! In this case, we will not have two emotions - emotions of grief that we have given 10dollarov and the emotions of joy that we received in return a valuable thing. Our PK streamlined our emotional reaction, ie We understand that the transaction as a whole is profitable. If we face the threat of losing 1000dollarov get up, or we have already lost this amount and is not in our power to influence at least once at this event, we can say to himself: "Well Well, money is not coming back, but smarter to forget about this loss, not all is lost, you have to be in good shape, go to work. After today I can earn 50dollarov. This is much less than a thousand, but it's better than a pointless and fruitless experience. " When a person stands in front of the threat that he perceives as a significant threat to one's own existence, his PK also optimizes this reaction. But how? "Living system" perceives its own existence, his own life as a value equal to, for example "X", and the lack of existence - it's "0" - zero! Even a few minutes or even one minute of life more than a million or a billion years of nonexistence (ie death). Loss 1000dollarov man perceives as a significant threat to life. He perceives this loss of (generally) as "the loss of welfare." Although in terms of possible selective sound machine and a threat to the existence and threat of losing 1000dollarov - is a threat of loss "selective points, just a different volume. It can be interchangeable. But some kind of 1 / 100000 chance of loss of life (such as a trip by train) is not perceived by man, as a significant threat. But if a person faces in his opinion, with a significant threat to his own life with the possibility of losing everything, as an alternative to this resource - it is "0", in which case any loss of welfare would be appropriate if it is lower, even in the most minimal degree of , a significant threat to life, because "X" divided by "0" - is infinitely greater value. This means that under this scheme, any significant threat to life will cause emotional stress response (fear + stress), which will be given "personal computer" consciousness as an optimized rational reaction, even if the efficiency of this reaction will be equal to minus 10 in the tenth degree or even lower. But as we know, there are many people who even in the most critical situations, when a significant threat to the existence of not losing composure, do not panic, stay cool and maintain a rational strategy.