On the one hand, the unconditional use of ...

On the one hand, certainly benefit from all kinds of protections designed to reduce the accumulating tension in the soul by distorting the original information or a corresponding change in behavior. On the other hand, their excessive Update does not allow to realize the objective situation adequately and creatively interact with the world. As noted by FW Bassin: "... the mechanism of psychological defense is a normal, constantly applied psychological mechanism. This mechanism is of great importance in the resistance of the organism of the disease and prevent - with its proper functioning - the disorganization of mental activity. " We tend to treat the psychological defense mechanisms (hereafter PZM) as specific to humans and is an important means of socio-psychological adaptation. PZM system is probably part of the overall system governing the relations of the individual with the environment (including biological). Relationship with other parts of the system through general levels, such as psychophysiological and psychosomatic. Thus, we can identify another problem: a lack of comprehensive research on the psychological defenses (psychology in conjunction with medicine, physiology and philosophy), which would allow to identify system-wide communication between the different types of protections: psychological (intrapersonal and interpersonal), physical, biological. We assume that the undoubted existence of such links and we hope to discover a number of similarities in their structure and functioning. Of particular interest is the comparison of pollution prevention with the immune system of the body. First, both systems perform a similar function - protecting: the immune system protects the integrity of the body, a guarantee of physiological health, and pollution prevention system protects the psyche from the stress and conflict, is responsible for mental health. Secondly, we can note the presence of similar dynamic patterns: a violation of one level leads to hypercompensation another, which manifests itself in the form of health problems. Third, both systems have a common physiological basis, and through it can interfere with each other. Thus, a list of the main problems is as follows: lack of practical convenience and methodologically correct definition of the concept of psychological defenses (PZ). Difficulties with the classification of CT. Contradictory nature of PZ. Isomorphism of pollution prevention and immune system. As the most important tasks you can specify: a) clarification of the possible signs of a system-wide similarity of the two protective subsystems holistic living creature, and b) search for the availability of the mutual influence of these systems, the interaction within the general protective function. By analogy with protection from external threats can identify a number of parameters that can be done comparing the two protective systems (in our case - immune and mental). For the analysis of interpersonal defenses (Dotsenko 1996) used the following variables: the subject of protection (the boundaries of protected), an agent of protection (threat), damages and remedies.